Criminal Tax Attorneys

Our firm focuses on representing clients under investigation by the IRS

40

Years of Legal Experience

Tax Investigations

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has an extensive job in the federal government to ensure business owners pay the taxes required under the Internal Revenue Code. To accomplish this task, the IRS is broken into two distinct divisions – Criminal Investigations Division (CID) and Civil Revenue Division.  The division where the case falls will dictate whether a civil or criminal tax attorney is the right fit.  The civil division is the arm of the IRS most frequently encountered by taxpayers.  This division conducts standard audits, assesses penalties and interest on backed taxes, reviews returns for accuracy, and otherwise deals with taxpayers who are not in full compliance with their tax obligations.  Civil tax attorneys and CPAs often represent clients undergoing routine IRS intervention from the civil division.

The criminal division only interacts with a taxpayer when their file has been flagged, or referred, for potential criminal activity. The criminal division operates under their own unique procedures with unique goals for enforcement. Every step taken by a CID Agent is aimed at collecting information for use in a later prosecution; this includes attempts to speak with the taxpayer and witnesses, or issuing summonses for various documents.  If a taxpayer receives documentation or a visit from the CID, their tax problems have gone beyond normal IRS involvement.  At that stage, the IRS believes a criminal violation may have been committed.  For that reason, it is imperative the taxpayer contact a competent criminal tax attorney for assistance.  The sooner the individual or company retains counsel, the better their chance of steering the case back into the civil division.

All criminal tax offenses are found within Title 26 of the United States Code. Though the code accounts for numerous criminal violations, there are four criminal tax offenses that are common in federal prosecutions: 1) tax fraud, 2) tax evasion, 3) failure to file, and 4) failure to pay withholding taxes.  These offenses account for the majority of prosecutions nationally, and make up the bulk of the criminal tax violations our firm handles on a yearly basis.

Criminal Tax Defense – Returning to the Civil Division

Most criminal tax investigations begin with a civil audit, or a referral from a bank or an unfriendly peer of the filer. Early in the process, the IRS will be calculating whether the matter should be handled by the civil or criminal divisions of the IRS. If an agent with the CID obtains the case, then a real risk exists that criminal charges will follow. Once a case reaches CID, the goal of any representation is to steer the case back under the civil umbrella.  Success in that area removes jail time and hefty financial penalties from the analysis and allows the taxpayer to deal with their backed taxes without the cloud of a criminal complaint.

One of the keys to returning a criminal case back to the civil division lies in understanding the DOJ procedures in this area.  A criminal tax case will always start with an investigation from an agent with the CID. When the agent’s investigation is complete, they will make a decision on whether the case should be referred to the Department of Justice (DOJ) in D.C. If they choose to make the referral, an attorney with DOJ will review the file and make a recommendation. If DOJ decides to move forward with criminal charges, the case is returned to local counsel for prosecution. Local counsel will make the decision on whether to indict. At each juncture in this road map, a tax filer has the opportunity to challenge the willfulness of their conduct, the accuracy of the government’s numbers, and the proposed tax loss under the IRC.

A competent criminal tax attorney will create legal/mitigation arguments to present to the government at each stage in this process.  Those arguments should be presented to the special agent with CID, the DOJ Tax lawyer in D.C., and local counsel in the jurisdiction of prosecution.  Those arguments will largely be based on alternative tax loss figures, correcting misunderstandings in the current evidence, legal arguments against knowledge, and building a “reliance on the advice of an expert” defense.  The drawn out nature of DOJ procedures allows ample time for the taxpayer to build their defense and present the nuts and bolts prior to indictment.  Depending on their strength, these arguments can be enough to steer the investigation back into the civil division.

Anyone under investigation by the CID needs a competent criminal tax attorney as soon as an agent makes contact. The attorneys at Odom, Davis & Hobson have been handling criminal tax cases for over 40 years. We have walked numerous clients through the process outlined above with good results. We deal with criminal tax cases on a daily basis, and understand the laws and procedures in this area.

Criminal Tax Defense – Taking the Case to Trial

We have two important goals in any criminal tax case. First, convince the government the case should be handled by the civil department. Second, if the case does end in a criminal indictment, build a defense against the allegations and take the facts before a jury.  Our firm has conducted numerous trials for various white collar crimes; including, criminal tax, health care fraud, wire fraud, embezzlement, and money laundering cases.  Trial defenses for a criminal tax case are largely built from the mens rea element for the offense – willfulness.  For nearly every Title 26 offense, the government must prove the defendant acted willfully.  Under that element, the government must prove the taxpayer knew of the legal duty imposed by the tax code, and armed with that knowledge, intentionally chose to violate that duty.  This standard is truly unique to criminal tax prosecutions as ignorance of the law is normally not a defense to criminal allegations.  We have a more detailed breakdown of the willfulness standard here.

Our criminal tax attorneys understand the legal principles from which Title 26 offenses are built.  We will craft a defense narrative around those principles forcing the government to show the facts warrant the heightened punishment available under the criminal statutes.  Our firm is a trial defense firm at its core, and we are equipped to handle criminal litigation from start to finish.  Though our goal is to avoid the risk of trial for the benefit of our clients and their companies.

Recent Results from our Criminal Tax Attorneys

In 2019, Brian Hobson and Wendell Odom successfully pulled two cases out of the CID and back under civil audit.  Both cases involved allegations of businesses underreporting income.  Both clients are no longer in the criminal system, and prison time is off the table.

In 2020, Brian Hobson represented a business owner in Houston.  He was charged with failing to report substantial income.  The alleged tax loss exceeded $1,000,000.  Brian was able to rework the numbers for the business to show the true tax loss was less than $100,000.  This recalculation took the client from a five year recommended prison sentence to five years probation.  Further, it drastically altered the restitution the client was asked to pay.  Following the case, the client continued operating his business and has been in compliance with the tax laws since.

In 2021, Brian Hobson and Wendell Odom were hired to represent a business owner charged with tax fraud in the Western District of Texas – Austin Division.  The case was set for trial in September of 2021.  After careful review of the client’s records, it was clear any inaccuracies in reporting were not willful as required under the tax fraud statute.  We discussed these issues with the government, and they agreed to dismiss all charges against the business owner.  Dismissals are exceptionally rare in the federal system.  The client is now free to continue operating his business and jail time is off the table.

In 2022, Brian Hobson represented a business owner in West Texas for failing to pay FICA taxes withheld from employee paychecks.  The alleged tax loss was $5,900,000 with a recommended sentence of four years in federal custody.  We developed substantial mitigation, and following a sentencing hearing, the client was sentenced to five years probation. The client was free to continue operating his business and return home to his family.

Leave your criminal tax case in the hands of qualified criminal tax attorneys.

Contact us today for a consultation.

Our attorneys write extensively on issues relating to criminal tax defense.  Those articles can be found at the Criminal Tax Defense Blog.

Further information can be found on our pages dedicated to tax evasion, tax fraud, and crypto tax defense:

 

Contact us today
for a consultation

Latest Blogs & News

A Historic Fraud: The Run that Exposed the Giant

This is the second post in a four-part series explaining the fall of FTX and the ultimate indictment...

A Historic Fraud: The Rise of FTX

Stories of the fall of crypto darling FTX, and its founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), are draped all over...

Understanding Restitution in Criminal Tax Cases

Criminal tax cases revolve around the tax loss involved in the alleged scheme.  The tax loss will shape...